Skip to content
← Library
For BothUpdated 2026-05-28· 8 min

Red Flags Guide: AI × Crypto Fundraising

What VCs look for in crypto projects, and what founders should watch out for in VCs. Both-sides guide.

Red flags: what VCs watch for in projects

Team

  • 🚩 Fully anonymous team with no verifiable on-chain or professional history
  • 🚩 Founder equity under 40% combined (too diluted to be motivated long-term)
  • 🚩 Vesting cliff under 1 year for the founding team
  • 🚩 Team that pivoted more than twice in under 18 months
  • 🚩 No technical co-founder in a technical product
  • 🚩 Founders who can't articulate the bear case for their own company

Tokenomics

  • 🚩 Team + investors > 40% of total supply
  • 🚩 Token vesting under 2 years for insiders
  • 🚩 Token utility = "governance" only (no economic reason to hold)
  • 🚩 No answer to "what happens if your token goes to zero?"
  • 🚩 Treasury denominated entirely in the project's own token
  • 🚩 Whitepaper that explains upside but is silent on failure modes

Product

  • 🚩 No live product at seed stage — concepts only
  • 🚩 TVL driven entirely by token incentives (farm-and-dump pattern)
  • 🚩 Smart contract not audited
  • 🚩 "AI" in the name but no real ML component (AI-washing)
  • 🚩 GitHub with no activity in 3+ months
  • 🚩 Roadmap with "Phase 1 complete" but no evidence of Phase 1

Pitch behavior

  • 🚩 Founders who dodge questions or give non-answers
  • 🚩 "We have no real competitors" (almost always wrong)
  • 🚩 TAM of $1T+ with no credible path to even 0.01%
  • 🚩 Deck with more buzzwords than data points
  • 🚩 Founders who can't disagree with each other in the room (groupthink)

Red flags: what founders should watch for in VCs

VCs have red flags too. Before taking a term sheet:

  • 🚩 No portfolio companies in your sector — they won't understand it and will be poor board members
  • 🚩 Valuation games — high valuation with heavy preferences, ratchets, or anti-dilution
  • 🚩 Asking for > 20% in seed without lead status — a standard seed lead takes 10-20%
  • 🚩 No reference calls offered — ask for 3 founders they've worked with and call them
  • 🚩 Partner bait-and-switch — the partner you pitched won't sit on your board; a junior will
  • 🚩 Moving slowly without explanation — good VCs move in 2-3 weeks; slow = low conviction
  • 🚩 Exclusivity before a term sheet — no reputable fund asks for this
  • 🚩 More interested in your token allocation than your business — they're traders, not investors
  • 🚩 Never asks about team or culture — only market and exit — misaligned priorities
  • 🚩 Wants major product-direction changes pre-investment — they're investing in their vision, not yours

Green flags: a good VC relationship

For founders:

  • ✅ They've been through a similar journey — they pattern-match your problems
  • ✅ They move decisively — confirmed or declined within 2 weeks of the first meeting
  • ✅ They introduce you to customers / founders without being asked
  • ✅ They push back on your assumptions — engaged, not just cheerleading
  • ✅ When things go wrong, they problem-solve with you instead of micromanaging

For VCs:

  • ✅ The founder raises the hard problems before you ask
  • ✅ Founders disagree with each other in front of you — they think independently
  • ✅ They can explain their failure modes clearly — not delusional
  • ✅ References describe them as "hard to work with but always right" (execution-oriented)
  • ✅ They say no to things outside their core — focus is a discipline

Lookout Library · updated 2026-05-28 · not financial advice