← Library
For BothUpdated 2026-05-28· 8 min
Red Flags Guide: AI × Crypto Fundraising
What VCs look for in crypto projects, and what founders should watch out for in VCs. Both-sides guide.
Red flags: what VCs watch for in projects
Team
- 🚩 Fully anonymous team with no verifiable on-chain or professional history
- 🚩 Founder equity under 40% combined (too diluted to be motivated long-term)
- 🚩 Vesting cliff under 1 year for the founding team
- 🚩 Team that pivoted more than twice in under 18 months
- 🚩 No technical co-founder in a technical product
- 🚩 Founders who can't articulate the bear case for their own company
Tokenomics
- 🚩 Team + investors > 40% of total supply
- 🚩 Token vesting under 2 years for insiders
- 🚩 Token utility = "governance" only (no economic reason to hold)
- 🚩 No answer to "what happens if your token goes to zero?"
- 🚩 Treasury denominated entirely in the project's own token
- 🚩 Whitepaper that explains upside but is silent on failure modes
Product
- 🚩 No live product at seed stage — concepts only
- 🚩 TVL driven entirely by token incentives (farm-and-dump pattern)
- 🚩 Smart contract not audited
- 🚩 "AI" in the name but no real ML component (AI-washing)
- 🚩 GitHub with no activity in 3+ months
- 🚩 Roadmap with "Phase 1 complete" but no evidence of Phase 1
Pitch behavior
- 🚩 Founders who dodge questions or give non-answers
- 🚩 "We have no real competitors" (almost always wrong)
- 🚩 TAM of $1T+ with no credible path to even 0.01%
- 🚩 Deck with more buzzwords than data points
- 🚩 Founders who can't disagree with each other in the room (groupthink)
Red flags: what founders should watch for in VCs
VCs have red flags too. Before taking a term sheet:
- 🚩 No portfolio companies in your sector — they won't understand it and will be poor board members
- 🚩 Valuation games — high valuation with heavy preferences, ratchets, or anti-dilution
- 🚩 Asking for > 20% in seed without lead status — a standard seed lead takes 10-20%
- 🚩 No reference calls offered — ask for 3 founders they've worked with and call them
- 🚩 Partner bait-and-switch — the partner you pitched won't sit on your board; a junior will
- 🚩 Moving slowly without explanation — good VCs move in 2-3 weeks; slow = low conviction
- 🚩 Exclusivity before a term sheet — no reputable fund asks for this
- 🚩 More interested in your token allocation than your business — they're traders, not investors
- 🚩 Never asks about team or culture — only market and exit — misaligned priorities
- 🚩 Wants major product-direction changes pre-investment — they're investing in their vision, not yours
Green flags: a good VC relationship
For founders:
- ✅ They've been through a similar journey — they pattern-match your problems
- ✅ They move decisively — confirmed or declined within 2 weeks of the first meeting
- ✅ They introduce you to customers / founders without being asked
- ✅ They push back on your assumptions — engaged, not just cheerleading
- ✅ When things go wrong, they problem-solve with you instead of micromanaging
For VCs:
- ✅ The founder raises the hard problems before you ask
- ✅ Founders disagree with each other in front of you — they think independently
- ✅ They can explain their failure modes clearly — not delusional
- ✅ References describe them as "hard to work with but always right" (execution-oriented)
- ✅ They say no to things outside their core — focus is a discipline
Lookout Library · updated 2026-05-28 · not financial advice